Skip to content

Task Force comments on DSM-5 revision

June 16, 2011

The Task Force submitted two sets of comments this week on the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) proposed changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM).

In the first set of comments, the Task Force applauded the APA’s proposal to move gender dysphoria into its own section and out of the section on paraphilias and sexual dysfunctions. This shift recognizes the reality of transgender people’s lives and is a step toward reducing social and cultural stigma trans people face. In its comments, the Task Force expressed its hope that “evolving social and scientific understanding of gender expression will lead to the elimination of gender dysphoria” from the DSM in the future.

The Task Force’s comments also called for the elimination of some technical language relating to who is considered “post-transition.” Further, the comments explained why it was a problem to include intersex people under the DSM’s definition of gender dysphoria, which was not done in the last DSM.

In its second set of comments, the Task Force strongly urged the APA to eliminate “transvestic disorder” from the DSM. After noting that the label of “transvestic disorder” is used to undermine social and legal recognition of transgender and gender non-conforming people, the Task Force’s comments surveyed the scientific literature and demonstrated the lack of evidence for this diagnosis.

This follows up on the Task Force’s previous comments from last year, which urged the elimination of “transvestic disorder” and “autogynephilia” from the DSM due to the underlying sexism of this category. The sexism was belied by the fact that it only categorized males who dress as women as disordered, not females who dress as men. Presumably in response to those comments, the APA included the scientifically unproven “autoandrophilia” in the diagnosis in order to make the diagnosis gender-neutral. The Task Force explained that adding “autoandrophila” — which is also not proven to exist scientifically — does not eliminate the sexism. In fact, it only masks the sexism.

The new edition of the DSM is set to be released in 2013, 40 years from the date when the Task Force worked to change the APA’s classification of homosexuality as a mental disorder, and worked with psychiatrist allies to defeat a proposed association-wide referendum to stop the declassification.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. Henry Hall permalink
    June 16, 2011 6:59 pm

    No mention of the WPATH statement of policy that gender variance should never be psychopathologised.

    The NGLTF response to proposed DSM changes can best be described as trivial.

  2. gidreform permalink
    June 17, 2011 3:10 am

    Where can we read the content of these Task Force comments to the APA? I can only find the old version from April, 2010, on thetaskforce.com. Thanks!

  3. Henry Hall permalink
    June 17, 2011 7:40 pm

    Apparently the period for submitting comments has been extended by roughly a month.

    This gives NGLTF an opportunity to make a significant submission. In particular that, in accordance with WPATH policy that gender variance should not be psychopathologised, then each of these diagnoses should include an extra criterion as follows

    C. Gender variance has been ruled out as a cause of the condition.

    That is to say it should be permissible to use these diagnoses ONLY in cases where the patient is known to have no gender variance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: