In recent years, the LGBTQ movement has achieved an increased acceptance of gays and lesbians and made great progress in securing legal equality for same-sex couples. In communities of faith, too, more and more clergy and congregations have learned to welcome and affirm lesbian and gay members, and many faith traditions now endorse same-sex marriage. But too often, progressive faith leaders who have been on the front lines advocating for LGBTQ liberation have been silent about bisexuality.
Clergy and faith communities have long been on their own to understand and welcome bisexual people. Today our partners at the Religious Institute released a new resource for congregations entitled “Bisexuality: Making the Invisible Visible in Faith Communities.” Co-authored by Marie Alford-Harkey and the Rev. Debra W. Haffner, this guidebook aims to give faith leaders tools to break the silence on bisexuality and fully welcome bisexual people into their congregations.
The guidebook, which is written for a multifaith audience, is in three sections. Part One, “Bisexuality Basics,” includes a definition of terms, research, and myths and facts about bisexuality. Part Two, “Sacred Texts and Religious Traditions,” offers scriptural and theological resources from a variety of faith traditions. Part Three, “Creating a Bisexually Healthy Congregation,” provides tools and strategies to help faith communities become more welcoming and affirming of bisexual people.
The Religious Institute’s bisexuality guidebook complements several resources for clergy and faith communities developed by the Task Force’s Institute for Welcoming Resources, including the Building an Inclusive Church Toolkit, transACTION: A Transgender Curriculum for Churches and Religious Institutions, and A La Familia, a bilingual resources for Latin@ communities.
“Bisexuality: Making the Invisible Visible in Faith Communities” is available here.
by Javen Swanson, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Interim Faith Work Director
This week, nearly 5,000 Presbyterians are gathered in Detroit, Michigan, for the denomination’s 221st biennial General Assembly. There, policies are set for the Presbyterian Church (USA) and its 1.8 million members nationwide.
As the largest Presbyterian denomination in the United States, the deliberations taking place there this week could have huge implications for LGBTQ people.
First, an amendment to the Constitution of the PC(USA) would replace the existing language to recognize the marriages of same-sex couples. If passed by a simple majority of delegates at the Assembly, the amendment would also need to be ratified by two-thirds of the denomination’s 172 regional presbyteries.
Second, an “authoritative interpretation” would allow clergy to marry same-sex couples immediately without fear of discipline, regardless of the outcome of the vote on the constitutional amendment.
The last two General Assemblies have seen great advances for LGBTQ inclusion within the PC(USA). Four years ago, the Assembly approved a constitutional amendment allowing for the ordination of LGBTQ clergy. Two years ago, the denomination came very close to extending marriage to same-sex couples, falling short by just a handful of votes.
The Task Force and our Institute for Welcoming Resources is proud to work in coalition with More Light Presbyterians, which work for the full participation of LGBTQ people in the life, ministry, and witness of the PC(USA) and in society. We encourage you to read this reflection by Alex Patchin McNeill, Executive Director of More Light Presbyterians and the first transgender leader of an LGBTQ faith group, as the PC(USA)’s General Assembly begins its work this week.
by Javen Swanson Interim Faith Work Director at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
Thursday, June 19, 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM
6:00 PM for nosh/socializing
6:30 PM meeting
The Gill Foundation Community Room
2215 Market Street
Denver, CO, 80205
Creating Changers, bring a friend (or two!) and join your colleagues for fun and fabulous camaraderie. We will discuss our Pride outreach plans. At the meeting you can sign up for a volunteer shift, hear the progress being made by our various subcommittees, get to know your fellow Host Committee members, and plan to create change in Denver, in Colorado, and beyond!
Host Committee meetings will be held on the third Thursday of each month, June 2014 – January 2015. Show your pride in Denver’s LGBT communities by being a part of the action!
The Gill Foundation parking lot is located on the corner of 22nd and Market Street. Once the lot is full, guests should be able to find on-street parking or a nearby lot. The code for the parking lot and the main entrance is 3131#on the black keypad. When the indicator light turns green, give the door a push and a pull to open it. Please note that this code will not be active until exactly 5:30 pm on 6-19-14. The code for the pedestrian gate (to get back into the parking lot) is 4152.
The 27th National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change will be held in Denver, February 4 – 8, 2015 at the Sheraton Denver. Each year, the Task Force works with a dedicated group of volunteers who join the conference Host Committee to accomplish critical on-the-ground organizing and outreach. Come be part of it!
Today a very special liturgical stole was added to the Task Force’s Shower of Stoles Project. The stole belonged to Frank Schaefer, an ordained pastor of the United Methodist Church until he was defrocked in 2013 for officiating his son’s same-sex marriage.
Schaefer, a graduate of Princeton Theological Seminary, ministered in eastern Pennsylvania for 20 years before being brought to trial over his refusal to serve in accordance with the United Methodist Church’s Book of Discipline, which contains rules that discriminate against LGBTQ people. Schaefer’s courageous and faithful act has sent shockwaves through the United Methodist Church and may well be remembered as a galvanizing moment for the welcoming movement within the denomination. Now a United Methodist layperson, speaker, and activist, he continues to advocate for human rights.
The back of Schaefer’s stole contains heartfelt, hand-written messages from his colleagues and supporters: “God made you a prophet.” “Thank you for your strong stance for integrity in the church.” “Frank, ordained in the spirit—an ordination that can never be taken away.” “Thank you for your witness with a father’s love.” “We are greater today because we have been blessed by your courage.”
During his church “trial,” Schaefer wore a rainbow stole. Given the opportunity to give a closing statement, he spoke confidently to the “jury”: “I cannot go back to being a silent supporter,” he said. “I must continue to be in ministry with all people and speak for LGBTQ people. Members of the jury, before you decide my penalty, you need to know I wear this rainbow stole as a visible sign that this is who I am called to be.”
Schaefer went on: “We need to stop judging people. We need to stop the hate speech and treating our brothers and sisters like second-class Christians. We have to stop harming the beloved children of God.”
Frank Schaefer’s story reveals how much work remains to be done to ensure that LGBTQ people and allies can live rich and abundant lives—including freedom from spiritual violence. The Task Force’s Faith Work program works in collaboration with faith partners from a vast array of spiritual and religious traditions, including the Reconciling Ministries Network within the United Methodist Church, to create a world where all people feel safe practicing their faith as they feel called to do.
The Shower of Stoles Project is a collection of over a thousand liturgical stoles and other sacred items representing the lives of LGBTQ people of faith. These religious leaders have served in thirty-two denominations and faith traditions, in six countries, and on three continents. Each stole contains the story of an LGBTQ person who is active in the life and leadership of their faith community in some way. To learn more about the project, or to arrange an exhibit of stoles, visit The Shower of Stoles Project site.
Transgender people have always served in the the military, and are twice as likely to serve in the military than the general population. Yet to this day they remain barred from serving openly. The current ban on transgender people is based on military medical codes, which remained unaffected by the 2011 repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”–which was a legislative compromise reached in the 1990s that allowed lesbian, bisexual and gay individuals to serve as long as their sexuality wasn’t disclosed.
Advocates, including within the military, have been working tirelessly to remove the ban against transgender people and it seems this work is beginning to pay off. In an exclusive interview on May 11 that aired on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos,” Defense of Secretary Chuck Hagel said he’s now ready to reconsider the ban on transgender people serving in the military. In fact, he went on to say, “I’m open to those assessments, because — again, I go back to the bottom line — every qualified American who wants to serve our country should have an opportunity if they fit the qualifications and can do it,” and furthermore that transgender issues are “an area that we’ve not defined enough.”
Hagel said his biggest concern is providing the medical support necessary to support transgender individuals, especially if they are stationed in what he called “austere locations.”
On May 16, the White House appeared to signal support of Hagel’s comments. In statements made to Metro Weekly, White House Press Secretary Jim Carney said, “I would certainly point you to what Secretary Hagel said and we certainly support his efforts in this area.” These statements seem to show that there has been a dramatic shift in tone by the Pentagon and Obama administration on transgender military service. It seems the administration is headed in the right direction. Secretary Hagel and the administration’s statements are on the heels of a report released by a commission “to consider whether Pentagon policies that exclude transgender service members are based on medically sound reasons.” The Commission, convened by the Palm Center at San Francisco State University, included former US Surgeon General Dr. Joycelyn Elders and former Chief Health and Safety Director for the US Coast Guard Rear Admiral Alan Steinman, and its findings were recently published as the Report of the Transgender Military Service Commission.
The Task Force recently released a statement commending the Commission for stating independently what we all know: there is no compelling medical reason to exclude transgender people from serving their country if they choose, and if an individual decided to medically transitions that it would place almost no burden on the military. In August 2013 the Task Force also released a report “Still Serving in Silence: Transgender Service Members and Veterans in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey,” which provided data to help inform policy decisions on employment, housing, education, access to health care, and identity documents for transgender service members and veterans.
We believe that Secretary Hagel should immediately lift the transgender military service ban. Only by lifting the ban can we finish the job that the repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell began.”
Here are six reasons why we recommend that President Obama issue an executive order to lift the transgender military ban:
- There is no documented medical reason for the U.S. armed forces to prohibit transgender Americans from serving
- The Department of Defense’s regulations designed to keep transgender people from joining or remaining in the military on the grounds of psychological and physical unfitness are based on outdated beliefs.
- The ban itself is expensive, damaging, and an unfair barrier to health access for approximately 15,145 transgender personnel who currently serve in active, Guard, and reserve components according to the Commission and an additional 130,000 veterans.
- Lifting the ban places no burden on the military. The Commission rejected the notion that providing hormone treatment or sex reassignment surgeries would be too difficult, disruptive, and expensive are inconsistent with modern medical practice and the scope of health care services routinely provide by non-transgender military personnel.
- At least a dozen nations, including Australia, Canada, England, and Israel, allow military service of transgender individuals.
- Retired Brigadier General Thomas A. Kolditz, former Army Commander and West Point professor on the Commission stated, “Allowing transgender people to serve openly would reduce gender-based harassment, assaults and suicides while enhancing national security.”
The Palm Center Report concludes with policy recommendations that would improve care for U.S. service members without burdening the military’s pursuit of its vital missions:
- Lift the ban on transgender military service.
- Do not write new medical regulations or policies to address health care needs of transgender personnel, and instead, treat transgender service members in accordance with established medical practices and standards.
- Base new administrative guidance on foreign military and U.S. government precedents.
Transgender Americans are serving in the U.S. military. Currently there are over 15,145 transgender personnel who serve in active, Guard, and reserve components of the military. Additionally, there are already civilian transgender employees that work for the Department of Defense. According to the National Transgender Discrimination Survey(NTDS) report released in 2011, 20% of all respondents said they are or had been a member of the armed forces, and 30% of all respondents who identified as transgender women said they are or had been a member of the armed forces. According to the American Community Survey for 2011, the same year as the NTDS report, 10% of the non-transgender U.S. population had served in the military.
The transgender service member ban serves no purpose. Instead of discriminating against those who risk their lives to protect the government’s armed forces, we urge Secretary Hagel to lift the ban immediately, telling the world that the U.S. proudly respects its soldiers—regardless of gender identity.
Co-authored by Kylar W. Broadus, Senior Policy Counsel and Director of the Trans Civil Rights Project and Arielle P. Schwartz, Holley Law Fellow, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
In April, a sixteen year old African American transgender girl (known as Jane Doe) alleged to be too violent by the Department of Children and Families (DCF) was sent to Connecticut’s York Correctional Institution for adults. She was sent there without a criminal charge or conviction after an altercation that allegedly injured a DCF worker. She was also held in solitary confinement for two weeks for up to 22 to 23 hours per day in the adult institution until the court ruled on where to place here. Because of advocacy on her behalf, the court placed her in a women’s adult facility, instead of a men’s adult facility–which is normally what would have happened.
On Wednesday, April 14, Jane was moved from the mental health unit of the York Correctional Institution but the fact still remains that she is in an adult facility as a minor with many needs. Jane had already experienced abuse and trauma as most youth do prior to entering the DCF system. Also, the worker that was allegedly injured according to DCF accounts was able to fill out a report thirty minutes after the incident. It just doesn’t seem like the injuries could have been that extreme.
According to the National Transgender Discrimination Survey, “Injustice at Every Turn,” transgender women of color were particularly vulnerable to sexual assault in jail/prison. Thirty-eight percent (38%) of Black MTF respondents reported being sexually assaulted by either another inmate or a staff member in jail/prison. It is still horrific. How can this particular youth be any different than any other youth in the DCF system? Why should she have been transferred to an adult system and not other youth that display the exact same behavior in the DCF system?
Unfortunately, we know this is the rule rather than the exception when it comes to trans women of color. We’ve seen this happen far too often, most recently with Ce Ce McDonald. Even more dismaying in Jane Doe’s case is that she doesn’t have a lot of family to advocate for her.
You can support Jane by signing this petition started by the Yale Undergraduate Prison Project. You can also follow the Facebook page, J4J: Justice For Jane, and the Twitter account, @Justice4JaneCT, for further updates on her case. The Task Force’s Trans Civil Rights Project will continue to closely monitor her case and advocate on her behalf. Follow us on Twitter at @TheTaskForce for further updates.
By helping spread the word about Jane Doe’s case, you can help us build a movement that will end the unfair criminalization of transgender people of color and all LGBTQ people.
by Kylar Broadus, Senior Public Policy Counsel, Trans Civil Rights Project
By Moof Mayeda, Task Force Deputy Director of the Academy for Leadership and Action
This month is Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) heritage month and it is a time for reflection on both our past and on the future we would like to see. As the Task Force’s Deputy Director of the Academy for Leadership and Action, I work every day organizing grassroots campaigns to bring justice and liberation to all LGBTQ people, including the more than 250,000 undocumented LGBTQ immigrants in this country. And as a queer, Japanese American, gender non-conforming person, I am passionate about building an LGBTQ movement that celebrates our diverse identities and our diverse heritage.
During World War II, one side of my family was in Japan and the other was in the United States. My paternal grandmother, Yoshiye Mayeda, who was born and raised in the US, was put in an internment camp while her husband served in the Military Intelligence Service with other Japanese Americans. After the war ended, my maternal grandmother, Haruko Miyamoto, moved her while family from Japan to the US, including my mom, who was just a kid at the time. When other Japanese Americans ask me what generation I am (a fairly common question, in my experience), I’m not sure what to say, because it’s complicated and different on each side of the family. I sometimes tell them I’m “no sé,” which is a Spanish take on “Nikkei” (second generation) that means “I don’t know.” Like many other Japanese Americans, the men in my family were gardeners, because it was often the only work they could get, regardless of their educational or employment background. Whether or not you’re documented, immigrants face social, political, and economic barriers. What my family’s story taught me is that my American-ness can be challenged at any time because of my race.
As we celebrate Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, I reflect on my family’s history in this country and about our nation’s broken immigration system. Through the Task Force’s Naming Our Destiny program, which builds the power of queer and trans people of color organizations, I worked with API Equality LA on an immigration reform campaign. I helped them plan and execute weekly phone banks to call their members and get supporters to contact their legislators. It was very moving to talk openly with volunteers and members about why immigration reform matters to us, personally. There is such a diversity of experience in “the Asian American community,” which is made up of hundreds of distinct and varied cultures and ethnicities. API Equality LA successfully mobilized over 50 volunteers at their phone banks and generated hundreds of calls to legislators urging them to pass immigration reform.
While the struggle for fair and comprehensive immigration reform continues, LGBTQ immigrants are still hard at work building a movement that celebrates all of who we are, where we get to be our full queer and trans and brown and yellow and immigrant selves. Right now, there are 11 million undocumented immigrants who lack access to all the things that make up the promise of America. 250,000 of these people are LGBTQ and some are from our communities. The Task Force is at the forefront of the fight for fair immigration reform. Last year the US Senate passed a bipartisan immigration reform package. Today we are still waiting for Speaker Boehner to bring this vitally important and popular measure to the floor of the House. As he delays, families face economic hardship and the heartbreak of separation through deportation. The situation is so critical that Task Force executive director Rea Carey was arrested in a civil disobedience outside the U.S. House of Representatives to protest its inaction on immigration reform.
Join us in celebrating Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month by telling your member of congress that we need fair immigration reform now.
To call your Member of Congress:
US Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121
To locate your Member on-line:
U.S. House of Representatives: www.house.gov